Comparative judgment – [digital] facilitator of affordances for teachers’ assessment practices
How does my standards stand this year compared to last year and how do they compare to my colleagues? Do I grade boys and girls work differently? Are all criteria equally important? What does criteria for success look like and do we share a common understanding of these? These are questions that many schools struggle with. Comparative judgment is an alternative method for assessing competences and performances as well as unpacking teachers’ assessement practices, resulting in a collective professional consensus with high reliability. Facilitated by digital tools providing promising results on how to increase affordances for teachers’ assessment practices. Dr Eva Hartell will summarise research, and elaborate on the practical use of comparative judgement mainly for formative purposes.